US Politics: The Mosque at "Ground Zero" --- "Mutual Respect & Tolerance" (Bloomberg)

On Tuesday, the Preservation Commission of New York City voted 9-0 to deny "historic protection" for a building, near the site of the 11 September 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center. The decision clears the way for the establishment of a mosque.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xk5Ql1sYm9c&playnext=1&videos=D8UgJvZJCOU[/youtube]

In a speech with the Statue of Liberty in the background, Mayor Mike Bloomberg set acceptance of the mosque in the context of New York City's history and American values:

We have come here to Governors Island to stand where the earliest settlers first set foot in New Amsterdam, and where the seeds of religious tolerance were first planted. We’ve come here to see the inspiring symbol of liberty that, more than 250 years later, would greet millions of immigrants in the harbor, and we come here to state as strongly as ever – this is the freest City in the world. That’s what makes New York special and different and strong.

Our doors are open to everyone – everyone with a dream and a willingness to work hard and play by the rules. New York City was built by immigrants, and it is sustained by immigrants – by people from more than a hundred different countries speaking more than two hundred different languages and professing every faith. And whether your parents were born here, or you came yesterday, you are a New Yorker.

We may not always agree with every one of our neighbors. That’s life and it’s part of living in such a diverse and dense city. But we also recognize that part of being a New Yorker is living with your neighbors in mutual respect and tolerance. It was exactly that spirit of openness and acceptance that was attacked on 9/11.

On that day, 3,000 people were killed because some murderous fanatics didn’t want us to enjoy the freedom to profess our own faiths, to speak our own minds, to follow our own dreams and to live our own lives.

Of all our precious freedoms, the most important may be the freedom to worship as we wish. And it is a freedom that, even here in a City that is rooted in Dutch tolerance, was hard-won over many years. In the mid-1650s, the small Jewish community living in Lower Manhattan petitioned Dutch Governor Peter Stuyvesant for the right to build a synagogue – and they were turned down.

In 1657, when Stuyvesant also prohibited Quakers from holding meetings, a group of non-Quakers in Queens signed the Flushing Remonstrance, a petition in defense of the right of Quakers and others to freely practice their religion. It was perhaps the first formal, political petition for religious freedom in the American colonies – and the organizer was thrown in jail and then banished from New Amsterdam.

In the 1700s, even as religious freedom took hold in America, Catholics in New York were effectively prohibited from practicing their religion – and priests could be arrested. Largely as a result, the first Catholic parish in New York City was not established until the 1780’s –-- St. Peter’s on Barclay Street, which still stands just one block north of the World Trade Center site and one block south of the proposed mosque and community center.

This morning, the City’s Landmark Preservation Commission unanimously voted not to extend landmark status to the building on Park Place where the mosque and community center are planned. The decision was based solely on the fact that there was little architectural significance to the building. But with or without landmark designation, there is nothing in the law that would prevent the owners from opening a mosque within the existing building. The simple fact is this building is private property, and the owners have a right to use the building as a house of worship.

The government has no right whatsoever to deny that right – and if it were tried, the courts would almost certainly strike it down as a violation of the U.S. Constitution. Whatever you may think of the proposed mosque and community center, lost in the heat of the debate has been a basic question – should government attempt to deny private citizens the right to build a house of worship on private property based on their particular religion? That may happen in other countries, but we should never allow it to happen here. This nation was founded on the principle that the government must never choose between religions, or favor one over another.

The World Trade Center Site will forever hold a special place in our City, in our hearts. But we would be untrue to the best part of ourselves – and who we are as New Yorkers and Americans – if we said ‘no’ to a mosque in Lower Manhattan.

Let us not forget that Muslims were among those murdered on 9/11 and that our Muslim neighbors grieved with us as New Yorkers and as Americans. We would betray our values --- and play into our enemies’ hands – if we were to treat Muslims differently than anyone else. In fact, to cave to popular sentiment would be to hand a victory to the terrorists – and we should not stand for that.

For that reason, I believe that this is an important test of the separation of church and state as we may see in our lifetime –-- as important a test –-- and it is critically important that we get it right.

On September 11, 2001, thousands of first responders heroically rushed to the scene and saved tens of thousands of lives. More than 400 of those first responders did not make it out alive. In rushing into those burning buildings, not one of them asked "What God do you pray to?" "What beliefs do you hold?"

The attack was an act of war – and our first responders defended not only our City but also our country and our Constitution. We do not honor their lives by denying the very Constitutional rights they died protecting. We honor their lives by defending those rights – and the freedoms that the terrorists attacked.

Of course, it is fair to ask the organizers of the mosque to show some special sensitivity to the situation –-- and in fact, their plan envisions reaching beyond their walls and building an interfaith community. By doing so, it is my hope that the mosque will help to bring our City even closer together and help repudiate the false and repugnant idea that the attacks of 9/11 were in any way consistent with Islam. Muslims are as much a part of our City and our country as the people of any faith and they are as welcome to worship in Lower Manhattan as any other group. In fact, they have been worshipping at the site for the better part of a year, as is their right.

The local community board in Lower Manhattan voted overwhelming to support the proposal and if it moves forward, I expect the community center and mosque will add to the life and vitality of the neighborhood and the entire City.

Political controversies come and go, but our values and our traditions endure – and there is no neighborhood in this City that is off limits to God’s love and mercy, as the religious leaders here with us today can attest.

Iran Feature: The Activism of the Women's Movement (Mouri)

EA contacts have notified us of a new electronic journal on the Middle East and Iran, Muftah. One of its first articles is by Leila Mouri, an Iranian women's rights activist who works as a journalist with the first Iranian website on women’s rights, Women In Iran and blogs in Persian and in English.

Shiva Nazar-Ahari, a journalist and human rights defender who had already spent 9 months in Evin prison, was scheduled to appear in court on May 23, 2010 on charges of propagation against the regime for her work with the Committee of Human Rights Reporters (CHRR), as well as allegations of acting against national security because of her participation in gatherings on November 4th and December 7th, 2009. A member of the “One Million Signature” campaign for women’s rights, Nazar-Ahari was arrested at her home shortly after Iran’s June 2009 presidential election. She was released for a short time in September on $200,000 bail, but her freedom did not last long. In December 2009 she was again arrested, this time as she was on the way to attend the funeral ceremony of Ayatollah Hossein Montazeri.  Despite consistent pressure from Iranian authorities, she had denied all charges brought against her and had paid the price of defiance by spending most of her prison term in solitary confinement.

While Nazar-Ahari was arrested too soon after the election to participate in the June demonstrations, many women were involved in the uprising  and played a central role in the mobilization of the Green Movement.

A more recognizable symbol of women’s participation in the protests was the young university student Neda Agha-Soltan, whose shooting and gruesome death on the streets of Tehran on June 20, 2009 became aninternational rallying cry against the heavy-handed tactics of the Iranian government. Agha-Soltan became a symbol not only of the Green Movement, but also of all Iranians who were killed for opposing the regime.  In a heavily patriarchal society, her ordeal was a reminder of the crucial status of women in the social and political life of Iran.

Agha-Soltan and Nazar-Ahari are members of a new generation of politically active Iranian women, born and raised after the 1979 Revolution. Their struggle against the oppressive policies of the Islamic Republic has been well documented, but their situation has become especially harrowing over the last year. In the wake of the 2009 protests, and under the pretext of maintaining order and protecting national security, the Iranian regime has escalated its suppression of the women’s movement. Many women activists have been arrested, imprisoned, tortured and sentenced to long prison terms, while others have left the country in fear of their safety. As a result, there has been a troubling decline in the activities and influence of the women’s movement, which some observers have considered to be the most potent agent for change in the country.

The Re-Emergence of Women in the Islamic Republic

The death of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1989, coinciding with the end of the Iran-Iraq war, marked the beginning of a new phase in the Islamic Republic. After eight years of war, Iran’s decimated economy was suffering from a lack of foreign investment and buckling under the pressure of Western sanctions. The regime responded by instituting a series of programs aimed at “reconstruction,” through economic growth, rational distribution of benefits and essential changes in human resource development. It was at this time that President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanajani established the first governmental department devoted to women’s issues. Dubbed the Bureau of Women’s Affairs, it was founded in 1992 to improve the situation of women and to promote their abilities and talents, in service to the future development of the country.

The ensuing years saw increased investment in women’s education, and in turn a higher level of university-enrollment, a development that had a significant impact on the status women in society. One major factor in this regard was the “Islamicization” of universities, a series of policies aimed at the transformation of the university environment and pursued from the early days of the Islamic Republic. With traditional families feeling more confident in the piety of Iran’s universities, women began attending classes at a higher rate than in previous generation, causing a dramatic increase in the number of female students. According to the 1994 census, 40 percent of university students were female. This proportion reached 60 percent in the 2003-2004 academic year and 64 percent in 2008.

Following graduation, many of these female students entered the job market only to be bitterly disappointed with their prospects. Faced with an ailing economy and a patriarchal culture unwilling to grant them equal rights, this educated group of women began demanding changes in attitudes and policies. At the same time, the influx of educated female candidates had a perceptible effect on the percentage of women employed in different economic sectors, such as industry and agriculture, with their numbers increasing substantially. The growing presence of women in the work force gradually led to the establishment of women’s trade unions in the late 1990s.

Read rest of article....

Gaza Latest: Why Israel Is Welcoming the UN Enquiry

On Monday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu informed United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon that Israel would accept an international probe into the raid on the Freedom Flotilla on 31 May.

The panel will begin its work on 10 August and will file its first report with the UN Security Council by the middle of September. Heading the panel will be former New Zealand Prime Minister Geoffrey Palmer, an expert on international maritime law. The vice chairman is outgoing Colombian President Alvaro Uribe, who is considered pro-Israel and pro-United States. Turkey and Israel also will send representatives.

This is the first time Israel is cooperating with a UN investigation of the actions of Israel Defense Forces. Haaretz reports the mandate of the panel:

The panel's mandate is to examine the investigations that Israel and Turkey are carrying out regarding the incident of the Gaza-bound flotilla on May 31. In addition, the panel will seek to examine the facts surrounding the flotilla and recommend ways to avoid such incidents in the future.

The panel will not be authorized to call witnesses --- especially no Israeli soldiers or officers.

So it will be a very limited investigation; the US Ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, said the nternational panel will be "complementary" to national enquiries. Rice added that the US expected  "that the Panel will operate in a transparent and credible manner and that its work will be the primary method for the international community to review the incident, obviating the need for any overlapping international inquiries".

So why did Israel, contrary to initial expectations, accept a UN panel? Because, at the end of the day, it is an investigation doing no more than looking at national (i.e., Israeli) investigations which have already tried to define the findings, findings which have already tried to contain the fact that nine activists died on board the Flotilla.

MENA House: Rockets on Jordan and Israel; Lebanon-Israel Clash --- UPDATES

UPDATE 0705 GMT: Robert Fisk, writing in The Independent of London, reviews the clash between Israeli and Lebanese forces.

On Sunday, a few hours before six rockets hit Israel, Jordan, and the sea off the coast, Israeli President Shimon Peres was returning from Cairo and talks with Egyptian counterpart Hosni Mubarak.

Since Peres' departure, four key events have occurred, raising questions about growing instability in the region.

Early Monday morning, Deir el Balah, a refugee camp in the southern region of the Gaza Strip was attacked by Israeli F16 fighter jets. The home of leader  Alaa al-Danaf, Hamas wing leader and Al-Qassam Brigades leader was targeted. Military medical services coordinator Adham Abu Salmiyya said, "At least 42 civilians were injured in the attack."

UPDATED Israel-Lebanon: Border Clash Kills At Least 4 Soldiers, Journalist (Al Jazeera)
MENA House: “Iranian” Rockets Used in Attacks on Israel and Jordan

About 90 minutes later, the rockets struck Eilat in Israel and Aqaba in Jordan. One Jordanian was killed and four other people were injured.

On Tuesday, Israeli and Lebanese forces clashed on the border. Three Lebanese soldiers and a Lebanese journalist died. Lieutenant Colonel Dov Harari, an Israeli battalion commander, was killed, and a second Israeli officer was critically wounded. in an exchange with the Lebanese army.

Debate on Launch Location of "Iranian rockets"

A top Jordanian government official claims there is proof that the rockets were fired from the Sinai in Egypt; however, he did not elaborate on the precise location.

Ahmed Meslemani reported that Egyptian security officials have denied the assertion: "It would not be logical geographically to fire from the Sinai peninsula as the area is mountainous and with very high security."

An Egyptian intelligence official said that police and 100 Bedouin trackers searched the area in the Sinai thoroughly but found nothing. He added that surveillance cameras also picked up no indication of activity: "They (Jordanians and Israelis) said that the rocket was fired from the Pharaoh hotel close to Taba. We searched and we found nothing."

China Special: Beijing's Diplomatic Offensive for Economic Growth

In the past few months, Chinese leaders have been paying more official visits around the world (see list at end of article). Besides the sightseeing, "maintaining stable economic growth and promoting development are the main goals of China's diplomacy in 2010”.

China has historically tried to strengthen bilateral and multilateral relationships with other countries and organizations through economic cooperation and development rather than military alliances such as NATO. As Yang Jiechi, the Chinese Foreign Minister, asserts,“China's development has been made possible by our dedicated efforts on the economic and social fronts, not by armed expansion abroad."

Examples?

*At the APEC (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation) Summit in 2009, Chinese President Hu Jintao called for greater efforts to promote trade and investment liberalisation and to oppose protectionism in dealing with the economic crisis/

*On 1 January 2010, the China-ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) Free Trade Area, the world's largest FTA embracing developing countries, was created, with the average tariff on goods from ASEAN countries to China cut to 0.1%, and the six original ASEAN members slashing the average tariff on Chinese goods from 12.8% to 0.6%.

*On May 2010, China and the United States held the second round of the Strategic and Economic Dialogues in Beijing, discussing key issues including trade, investment, global economy recovery, and climate change.

*In July 2010, German Chancellor Angela Merkel paid an official visit to China. The two countries pledged to strengthen dialogue and cooperation in a wide range of areas including politics, economy,and culture.

*China, Japan, and South Korea are researching the establishment of a free trade area among the three nations. This research will be completed before 2010.

While many countries have yet to escape the aftereffects of the global economic downturn, China achieved the fastest growth worldwide in 2009, becoming the second-largest importing country and the largest exporter. At the same time, China still faces many challenges and difficulties. For example, China's per capita GDP is still lower than that of at least 100 countries. With the shrinking of overseas markets, China’s exports are suffering a sharp decrease. China is “at the lower end of the global industrial chain and lacks competitiveness in scientific research and development and high-end manufacturing”. Inside the country, the wealth gap between rich and poor, and the unevenness of development between east and west is increasing.

The international financial and economic crisis has been the catalyst for China to accelerate its economic restructuring and transformation of growth patterns. In June, Chongqing, the biggest municipality of China, won government approval to set up a special economic zone --- Liangjiang New Area --- the nation's third of its kind after Shanghai Pudong and Tianjin Binhai. Liangjiang New Area is set to become a modern manufacturing base and the premier financial center in western China, driven by pillar industries including IT, automobile, and equipment and machinery manufacturing.

In July, the Chinese central government unveiled an ambitious plan to boost growth and development in its western region --- more than 70 percent of the Chinese mainland's area and habitat of 75 percent of the country's ethnic minority population, involving six provinces, five autonomous regions, and the Chongqing municipality.

On the one hand, China endeavours to promote economic and trade cooperations, introducing more foreign investments and importing more energy resources and high technology. According to a report of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, China became the second-largest recipient of foreign investment in 2009, attracting $95 billion of foreign capital.

On the other hand, China seeks to expand exports and overseas investment. Statistics from the Ministry of Commerce show that China's outbound direct investment surged by 24 percent to $55.18 billion during the first six months of 2010, mainly in the sectors of mining, commercial services, manufacturing, wholesale, and retail.

This is the context for China's diplomacy “maintaining stable economic growth and promoting development”. Expanding economic influence support China's effort to amplify its voice on global affairs, defending its interests and strengthening the country's image as a responsible international power. Economic diplomacy is linked in particular to peace and development in the Asia-Pacific Region.

The Major Official Visits of Chinese Leaders in 2010

Jan 5-14: Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi visited Kenya, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Algeria, Morocco, Saudi Arabia and Maldives;

Mar 17-28: Vice Premier Hui Liangyu visited Cambodia, Laos, Palestine, Israel and India;

Mar 20-30: Vice President Xi Jinping visited Russia, Belarus, Finland and Sweden;

Mar 21-Apr 1: Jia Qinglin, chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, visited Cameroon, Namibia and South Africa;

Apr 12-17: President Hu Jintao attended the Nuclear Security Summit in Washington and the Second BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) Summit in Brasilia, and visited Brazil.

(From April 17-18, President Hu should have visited Venezuela and Chile, but the trip was deferred because of the earthquake in Qinghai Province. On April 22-25, Premier Wen Jiabao was scheduled to visit Brunei, Indonesia and Myanmar, but it was postponed because of the earthquake.)

May 8-9: President Hu Jintao attended the ceremony marking the 65th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945 in Moscow, Russia;

May 28-Jun 3, Premier Wen Jiabao paid a formal visit to South Korea, Japan, Mongolia, and Myanmar and attended the third China-Japan-South Korea Summit in Jeju Island, South Korea;

Jun 5-19: He Guoqiang, a member of the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee and head of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection of the CPC, visited Italy, Iceland, Norway, Lithuania and Turkmenistan;

Jun 8: State Councilor Dai Bingguo took part in the third summit of the Conference on Interaction and Confidence-building Measures in Asia, which was held in Istanbul, Turkey;

Jun 9-11: President Hu Jintao visited Uzbekistan and attended the 10th Meeting of the Council of Heads of States of Shanghai Cooperation Organization was held in Tashkent, Uzbekistan;

Jun 9-21: Vice Premier Zhang Dejiang visited Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Greece and Austria;

Jun 14-24: Vice President Xi Jinping visited Bangladesh, Laos, New Zealand and Australia;

Jun 23-27: President Hu Jintao visited Canada and took part in the fourth summit of Group of Twenty (G20) in Toronto;

Jul7-2:, Wu Bangguo, chairman of the Standing Committee of China's National People's Congress, visited France, Serbia and Switzerland and also attended the third World Conference of Speakers of Parliament in Geneva, Switzerland;

Jul 20-27: State Councilor Dai Bingguo visited Ethiopia, Algeria, Equatorial Guinea, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Zambia;

Jul 25-Aug 4: Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi visits Austria, Mexico, Cuba and Costa Rica.