Iran Propaganda 101: Nanodiamonds, Nukes, "Western Officials", and The Washington Post

A discussion, including David Albright and Karim Sadjadpour, on a Sunday talk show about the IAEA report and Iran's nuclear programme

See also Iran Feature: Did Unnamed Officials Use the Media to Turn Nanodiamonds into Nuclear Bombs?

---

A classic case study in how information/propaganda --- choose the word according to your perspective --- circulates between Western governments, supportive media, and "think tanks"....

Click to read more ...

Afghanistan Feature: US "Night Raids" Kill More than 1500 People in 10 Months (Porter)

UPDATE 1344 GMT: The Afghanistan International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) has responded to this article, which we were sure would spark debate, on Twitter. Here is the conversation between EA's James Miller and @ISAFmedia.

ISAFmedia: That story is utterly false. Accurate civilian casualty numbers for that period in this report.

JMiller_EA: @ISAFmedia your stats, according to Porter - 6,282 dead in SOF night raids in 10 months. He's arguing that they aren't all insurgents...so, Porter is arguing that there are discrepancies between insurgents killed and total killed.

JMiller_EA: @ISAFmedia actually, I encourage you to see stats on original article. my mistake on "6282" number. [6,282 is the number of raids claimed over the period]

ISAFmedia: Methodology based on # of shots fired. Story says somebody dies every time a shot is fired. WRONG...@jmiller_ea It's ridiculous to state that a target dies every time a shot is fired, then base casualty totals on the number of gunshots.

JMiller_EA: @ISAFmedia somebody from ISAF leaked some very high, very confusing numbers bit.ly/sMLC8D and official report does not clarify...@ISAFmedia IPS is claiming that they got data from WaPo, leaked from ISAF bit.ly/sMLC8D [Some data was also obtained from the New York Times, but the ISP article doesn't contain a single hyperlink to the original source material.

ISAFmedia: @JMiller_EA Fact remains: His claim of 1500 civ dead in period cited is completely untrue... Official report cites the most accurate CIVCAS # available. No idea where they're getting this other info... act also remains: Insurgents cause +80% of CIVCAS. Any assumption that ISAF is leading cause is also utterly false

JMiller_EA: @ISAFmedia worth noting that EA reposted the article to spark this discussion. These are serious claims by major publication, IPS... IPS claim: "2,599 (targets) killed from May 2010 to mid-February 2011" in night raids. Accurate?

This conversation is, hopefully, not finished, as we'd like to properly investigate Porter's claims, and ISAF's response.

The original article by Gareth Porter is below:

Gareth Porter writes for Inter Press Service:

U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF) killed well over 1,500 civilians in night raids in less than 10 months in 2010 and early 2011, analysis of official statistics on the raids released by the U.S.-NATO command reveals.

That number would make U.S. night raids by far the largest cause of civilian casualties in the war in Afghanistan. The report by the U.N. Assistance Mission in Afghanistan on civilian casualties in 2010 had said the use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) by insurgents was the leading cause of civilian deaths, with 904.

Click to read more ...

Iran Analysis: Sometimes A Plot is a Drug Deal Gone Wrong (Porter)

Sketch of Manssor Arbabsiar at Court HearingIn the [US] complaint, the closest to a semblance of evidence that Arbabsiar sought help during that first meeting to assassinate the Saudi ambassador is the allegation, attributed to the DEA informant, that Arbabsiar said he was "interested in, among other things, attacking an embassy of Saudi Arabia". 

Among the "other things" was almost certainly a deal on heroin controlled by officers in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Three Bloomberg reporters, citing a "federal law enforcement official", wrote that Arbabsiar told the DEA informant he represented Iranians who "controlled drug smuggling and could provide tons of opium".

Click to read more ...

Wikileaks Special: A Guide to Day 3 of EA's Coverage

ANALYSES

1. Gary Sick assesses the revelations in the documents about the Obama Administration's "engagement" strategy towards Iran.

2. Scott Peterson reports on the scepticism over the sincerity of US approaches in light of the documents.

3. Gareth Porter dissects media coverage of stories such as the call of Arab leaders for military action against Tehran and North Korean missiles to Iran.

FEATURES AND DOCUMENTS

1. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asks about the Mystery of the Disappearing Anti-American Graffiti in Iran.

2. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad gives a US Congressman the ultimate answer to US questions about human rights.

Wikileaks-Iran Video Feature: Twisting the Tale from Arabs to North Korean Missiles

Journalist Gareth Porter speaks with The Real News about the initial handling of the Wikileaks documents on Iran, putting another context on the headline that Arab leaders called for military action against Tehran. (The interview starts at the 3-minute mark.)

Today Porter takes on the Monday article in The New York Times, "Iran Fortifies Its Arsenal With the Aid of North Korea"....

Click to read more ...

Iraq: Secret US Offer to Leave 15,000 Combat Troops after 2011 (Porter)

A special envoy from President Barack Obama raised the possibility in a secret meeting with senior Iraqi military and civilian officials in Baghdad Sep. 23 that his administration would leave more than 15,000 combat troops in Iraq after the 2011 deadline for U.S. withdrawal, according to a senior Iraqi intelligence official familiar with the details of the meeting.

But the White House official, Puneet Talwar, special assistant to the President and senior director for the Gulf States, Iran, and Iraq on the National Security Council (NSC) staff, said the deployment would have to be handled in a way that was consistent the president's pledge to withdraw U.S. troops completely from Iraq under the 2008 agreement, the official said. 

Talwar suggested that the combat troops could be placed under the cover of the State Department's security force, the Iraqi intelligence official told IPS.

Click to read more ...

Pakistan Analysis: Has Islamabad Stopped the US Offensive in Afghanistan? (Porter)

UPDATE 1400 GMT: Pakistan's Foreign Ministry has issued a statement, "After assessing the security situation in all its aspects, the government has decided to reopen the Nato/Isaf supply from the Pakistan-Afghanistan border at Torkham with immediate effect."

---

Latest news from south-western Pakistan is that gunmen have set fire to nearly 30 tankers parked near a roadside restaurant near the town of Sibi.

By continuing its halt in NATO convoys headed for Afghanistan through the Torkham border crossing into a second week, Pakistan's military leadership has brought an end to the unilateral attacks in Pakistan pushed by Gen. David Petraeus and forced Washington to make a new accommodation.

And it may make it impossible for Petraeus to make the argument in the future that the United States can succeed in Afghanistan, given the refusal of Pakistan to budge on the issue. 

The halt in NATO convoys bound for Afghanistan and unhindered attacks on tanker trucks have continued despite a decision by the White House to direct U.S. Ambassador to Pakistan Anne Patterson and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen to apologise to the Pakistani government for the deaths of three Pakistani soldiers resulting from a U.S. helicopter raid from Afghanistan into Pakistan.

Click to read more ...