Iran Election Guide

Donate to EAWV





Or, click to learn more

Search

« Super-Secret International Business | Main | The War on Terror Disconnect of the Day.... »
Wednesday
Dec032008

New Administration, Same Showdown with Iran?

Robert Dreyfuss, writing at TomDispatch.com, is not optimistic about a new US engagement with Tehran --- at least the kind that doesn't involve a smack of the fist. His lengthy article details the role of key Obama advisors in recentĀ "studies" advocating a US hard-line with the Iranians over their alleged nuclear weapons programme.

Are Key Obama Advisors in Tune with Neocon Hawks Who Want to Attack Iran?

....Several top advisers to Obama -- including Tony Lake, UN Ambassador-designate Susan Rice, Tom Daschle, and Dennis Ross, along with leading Democratic hawks like Richard Holbrooke, close to Vice-President-elect Joe Biden or Secretary of State-designate Hillary Clinton -- have made common cause with war-minded think-tank hawks at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), and other hardline institutes.

Last spring, Tony Lake and Susan Rice, for example, took part in a WINEP "2008 Presidential Task Force" study which resulted in a report entitled, "Strengthening the Partnership: How to Deepen U.S.-Israel Cooperation on the Iranian Nuclear Challenge." The Institute, part of the Washington-based Israel lobby, was founded in coordination with the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), and has been vigorously supporting a confrontation with Iran. The task force report, issued in June, was overseen by four WINEP heavyweights: Robert Satloff, WINEP's executive director, Patrick Clawson, its chief Iran analyst, David Makovsky, a senior fellow, and Dennis Ross, an adviser to Obama who is also a WINEP fellow.

Endorsed by both Lake and Rice, the report opted for an alarmist view of Iran's nuclear program and proposed that the next president set up a formal U.S.-Israeli mechanism for coordinating policy toward Iran (including any future need for "preventive military action"). It drew attention to Israeli fears that "the United States may be reconciling itself to the idea of 'living with an Iranian nuclear bomb,'" and it raised the spurious fear that Iran plans to arm terrorist groups with nuclear weapons.....

Read the full article at AlterNet....

Reader Comments (1)

As if the US-Israeli partnership was somehow not sufficiently entrenched already...

December 4, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterSam Markey

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>