Iran Election Guide

Donate to EAWV





Or, click to learn more

Search

« Follow-up on Iran: Closure of Human Rights Center | Main | A Farewell To George Bush: The Ten Low-Lights of the Presidency »
Friday
Jan022009

Gaza Update (10 a.m. Israel/Palestine; 8 a.m. Britain): Israeli Manoeuvres in Paris?

Update to the Update: "Israel is discussing with Washington the possibility of establishing an international monitoring system that would keep Hamas from rearming during a cease-fire, and ensure an end to rocket attacks on Israel, said diplomats familiar with the discussions."

It seems almost callous to speak of a "routine" of Israeli airstrikes against Gaza, as more than 50 attacks were carried out on Thursday. In addition to the killing of Hamas leader Nizar Rayyan, Israeli raids hit the home of "senior Hamas military operative" Nabil Amrin, the Parliament building, the Ministries of Justice, Education, and Civil Defense, and a mosque in Jabaliya. The Israeli Defense Forces said more than 40 rockets were fired into Israel.

There may be a twist in the diplomatic tale, however. Israeli Tzipi Livni traveled to Paris to meet Prime Minister  Nicolas Sarkozy and Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, only 24 hours after a French proposal for a humanitarian truce was rejected by the Israeli Cabinet. Livni said that the Israeli attacks had "achieved changes" and said the aim was to "weaken Gaza".



One possibility is that the Israeli Government, which has just permitted the departure of foreigners from the Gaza Strip, could be preparing for a ground assault. The Foreign Minister's words, however, point to another possibility: could Livni be backing away from the objective, declared on the eve of the Israeli assault, of overthrowing Hamas? And does her statement of "achieved changes" indicate that Israel may be ready to pause?

Perhaps coincidentally, perhaps not, I noted this yesterday from Donald Macintyre in The Independent:

There was a moment, back at the end of July 2006, when the second Lebanon war might just have ended five or six days after it began. We now know that Tzipi Livni, Israel's Foreign Minister, expressed serious concern that Israel might be missing a chance to reach a peace agreement at least as good as the one which would come a full four weeks and many hundreds of casualties – on both sides – later.



Reportedly, it was Minister of Defense Ehud Barak rather than Livni who supported the 48-hour truce in Israeli Cabinet discussions. Yet, with Sarkozy pressing his own role as an international statesman and travelling to Israel on Monday, it appears negotiations are ongoing for some manoeuvre which will permit an easing of Israeli operations while allowing Tel Aviv to claim victory in its immediate aim of facing down Hamas.

As Livni said, somewhat cryptically, after Thursday's talks, "The question of whether it's enough or not [for a truce] will be the result of our assessment on a daily basis," she said.

Reader Comments (8)

For days and days now, the Palestinians have launched hundreds of rockets at Israel from this place, but when Israel fights back they are vilified. Does nobody else see the SPIN in this????

January 2, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterBill Rothermel

Political Correctness is God. Nevermind Jesus, nevermind that other guy (wouldn't want to offend them). PC rules EVERYTHING!

January 2, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterBill Rothermel

I for one am sick and tired of the liberal press always trying to blame Israel for having a country. When is the western nations going to wake up and understand that Hamas and Hizbullah were both formed by Iran to fight proxy battles with Israel? What country will allow it's citizens to be subjected to daily rocket or mortar attacks? Israel sends in food, medicine, electricity, gas, water and what do they get in return - rockets and mortars. Either the press get realistic on this subject and stop saying that Israel is at fault or we will have similar things headed for other countries.

January 2, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterGene44

"Hamas was formed by Iran" lol

January 2, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterff07

"For days and days now, the Palestinians have launched hundreds of rockets at Israel from this place, but when Israel fights back they are vilified. Does nobody else see the SPIN in this????"

- I see the spin that exculpates the killing of many innocent civilians by a military force with the lastest and most advanced weaponry in the world under the term "collateral damage". The mantras seems to be "we may kill many more people than our enemies, but at least we do it with good intentions, and with a clear conscience". Well, i suppose that's okay then.

January 2, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterIan

To Gene44:

According to former State Department counter-terrorism official Larry Johnson, "the Israelis are their own worst enemies when it comes to fighting terrorism."

"The Israelis are like a guy who sets fire to his hair and then tries to put it out by hitting it with a hammer."

"They do more to incite and sustain terrorism than curb it," he said.

Aid to Hamas may have looked clever, "but it was hardly designed to help smooth the waters," he said. "An operation like that gives weight to President George Bush's remark about there being a crisis in education."

Cordesman said that a similar attempt by Egyptian intelligence to fund Egypt's fundamentalists had also come to grief because of "misreading of the complexities."

An Israeli defense official was asked if Israel had given aid to Hamas said, "I am not able to answer that question. I was in Lebanon commanding a unit at the time, besides it is not my field of interest."

Asked to confirm a report by U.S. officials that Brig. Gen. Yithaq Segev, the military governor of Gaza, had told U.S. officials he had helped fund "Islamic movements as a counterweight to the PLO and communists," the official said he could confirm only that he believed Segev had served back in 1986.

The Israeli Embassy press office referred UPI to its Web site when asked to comment.

There was no Hezbollah before Israel invaded Lebanon back in the 80s. If Israel keeps on doing what it is doing, there will be more lethal entities born. The wisest things would be to return the occupied land, dismantle illegal settlements and " Mr. Olmert bring down the wall"!!

Israel doesn't send in food, medicine, electricity gas. It lets in whenever it pleases. What right does Israel have to control all that?

January 2, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterIrfan Haqqee

Gene44, your homework is to read that UPI article and present your findings to this blog!

January 2, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterff07

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>